Not that Amazon.com seems to give a damn — if it did, it would be trying to counter a sensational string of wickedly bad press that’s been going on for months now — but it seems that even when the behemoth from Seattle behaves for a day or two and doesn’t do anything thuggish, it just gives people time to assess, well, how fucked up the company is ….
Take the still-building story MobyLives first reported on days ago — the one about Micahel Lewis‘ new book getting tons of one-star reader reviews from readers who admit, well, that they’re not readers — they’re cretins who haven’t read the book but who are pissed off because Lewis’ book isn’t available as an ebook yet. A series of childish tantrums, in other words, that a thing hasn’t been made in the format or at the price an individual desires (yet), and that Amazon has chosen not to take down as meaningless and unnecessarily harmful to everyone’s better business. By doing nothing Amazon seems to be doing something, and the criticism has been growing.
Take this commentary at Newser:
Michael Lewis has written an acclaimed best-seller about the financial industry, but you wouldn’t know it from the customer reviews on Amazon.com. … It’s yet another example why Amazon must change its policy, writes Paul Carr. The reviewers are punishing Lewis for a decision made by his publisher. This is “bullshit of the lowest order,” and things like this happen a lot with the Amazon reviews, writes Carr at TechCrunch. The problem is easy to fix: Allow only people who have actually bought the book to publish reviews. This makes them what they should be: assessments of the work in question rather than a soapbox for “assorted haters with an axe to grind.”
Then there’s the fact that Amazon is still playing a ridiculously tough game of hardball — threatening to remove buy buttons — with publishers who dare to strike deals with Apple for the new iPad. (See the earlier MobyLIves report.) As a commentary at Motley Fool puts it,
when the dust settles, I think you can count on most publishers getting to use the agency model that they seem to prefer, and which Apple has given its blessing to. With the iPad about to hit the scene, and e-readers from Sony (NYSE: SNE) and Barnes & Noble (NYSE: BKS) already putting a bit of competitive pressure on the Kindle, Amazon simply can’t afford to alienate its content partners by dictating the industry’s business model to them.
“At the heart of the matter,” says a report at Bizmology …
… is Amazon’s identity crisis. It started as a simple online bookseller, and much like its namesake river, it grew into an enormous torrent of goods. But even then, Amazon is not content to be a retailer, and it developed the Kindle to more efficiently deliver content. Even though the Sony Reader and other models had already been available, the Kindle, backed by Amazon’s marketing might, quickly gobbled up market share.
So now we have the Kindle, the Sony Reader, the Barnes & Noble nook, and finally, and most ominously, the Apple iPad. Amazon is no longer the only big dog. There’s a lot of competition out there, and Apple has a proven track record in this arena.
Amazon enjoyed the market lead for years and executed brilliantly for most of that time. It has a great deal of leverage, but to its own surprise, not as much as it thought it had. Now the lesson is being hammered home — being first is great, but you have to take a look behind and see what’s gaining.
And what’s gaining, it seems, is a consensus that the company is, well, out of control.
Dennis Johnson is the founder of MobyLives, and the co-founder and co-publisher of Melville House.