October 29, 2009

Meatheads

by

Jonathan Safran Foer

Jonathan Safran Foer

Anthony Bourdain

Anthony Bourdain

In his new guise as an intellectual ethicist, Jonathan Safran Foer has not only published a new book to promote vegetarianism counter-intuitively titled Eating Animals, he’s taken on one of the most ferocious meat-eaters of them all: Kitchen Confidential author Anthony Bourdain.

In an interview with Adam Sternbergh for New York Magazine, Foer told of having been a guest on the CNN program Larry King Live (another counter-intuitive title) along with Bourdain to discuss the topic “Is Meat Safe?”:

We were backstage in the green room and he was saying factory farming is the worst blight in America right now. In fact, I’d say he agreed with everything in my book. Then we get on the show and he says he thinks humans are designed to eat stupid little animals. Now, that annoys me. I find that disappointing — that his shtick is much more important to him than what he knows to be right.

But as a subsequent item on New York‘s Grub Street blog points out, that’s not exactly what Bourdain said on the show. They quote him saying that “I think the standard practices of outfits like Cargill and some of the larger meat processors and grinders in this country are unconscionable and border on the criminal … I think certainly we could eat better in this country. It would probably not be a bad thing if we ate less meat, if the ratio of animal protein to vegetables changed along the lines of the Chinese model.”

Then, Bourdain himself wrote in to comment on Foer’s remarks at the Grub Street item:

Disappointed?

Strangely enough, Mr. Foer’s comments to me immediately following the show were somewhat at odds with his account above. “I would have been afraid to say what you just said. They (the meat industry) are really litigious. They sued Oprah for less.” Given the perception that I am an ally of all things meat, I would have imagined that Mr. Foer–like the representative of the industry that night–was surprised at my heartfelt anger, incredulity and disgust with the practices described in the Times account. Sure caught ol’ Larry off guard.

Instead, Mr. Foer is surprised that after a casual and brief conversation with Himself, I did not instantly convert to vegetarianism–somewhere between green room and studio.

I would suggest that perhaps he flatters himself.

Foer apparently hasn’t commented further yet, but many others have on the various New York posts — such as one commentator at the Grub Street item who says, “Jonathan looks tasty, let’s eat him.”

Dennis Johnson is the founder of MobyLives, and the co-founder and co-publisher of Melville House.

  • Luke Woods

    firstly: Bourdain has more intellectual integrity inside a single lipid-clogged aorta than Foer has in his extended family. Second: Bourdain is capable of writing in a way that doesn’t make a normal (i.e. not a fifteen year old girl) reader gag. Third: Whoever suggested that Foer ‘looks tasty’ is dead-wrong: excess build-ups of both entitlement and twee have rendered his already atrophied muscles gamey. We’d have to stew him in the juices of real writer for several years before even attempting to digest him. No, the most we can hope for from Foer’s carcass is bone-meal and stock.

  • Luke Woods

    firstly: Bourdain has more intellectual integrity inside a single lipid-clogged aorta than Foer has in his extended family. Second: Bourdain is capable of writing in a way that doesn’t make a normal (i.e. not a fifteen year old girl) reader gag. Third: Whoever suggested that Foer ‘looks tasty’ is dead-wrong: excess build-ups of both entitlement and twee have rendered his already atrophied muscles gamey. We’d have to stew him in the juices of real writer for several years before even attempting to digest him. No, the most we can hope for from Foer’s carcass is bone-meal and stock.

  • Frascombe Bank

    If you read the Foer book (contrary to what Luke Woods says, it is readable, but possibly not if you’re into mind-blowing stuff like Kitchen Confidential), you’ll learn a lot about a serious problem that most vegetarians do not address in their rants about not eating animals. Foer is a pinata in the literary world, but that should not overshadow the contents of his book.

    Why doesn’t Tao Lin turn to the meat industry for his next book?

  • Frascombe Bank

    If you read the Foer book (contrary to what Luke Woods says, it is readable, but possibly not if you’re into mind-blowing stuff like Kitchen Confidential), you’ll learn a lot about a serious problem that most vegetarians do not address in their rants about not eating animals. Foer is a pinata in the literary world, but that should not overshadow the contents of his book.

    Why doesn’t Tao Lin turn to the meat industry for his next book?