October 30, 2009

Reasons four typos

by

The ever-vigilant Bookslut points us to an interesting piece by Stan Carey at his Sentence First blog about “a typo more mysterious than most” — typing “that” when you mean “than.” “If you Google “bigger that”, “more common that”, etc., and ignore the false positives, you’ll get a hint of the extent of this mistake,” writes Carey.

However, he continues, “For such a widespread and apparently simple typo, its cause is rather mysterious. It is not like typing my name as ‘Stab’ or ‘Stabn’, which I often do, and which is a simple misstroke resulting from the adjacency of B and N on a QWERTY keyboard and the mechanical imprecision of my typing. T and N are not adjacent, and that-for-than is not an error of omission, duplication, transposition, or repetition. Nor do that and than overlap in meaning. So whence this ubiquitous typo?”

It may be something called “capture errors” — typos that occur “when one intends to type one sequence, but gets ‘captured’ by another that has a similar beginning.’” Or it could be due to a similar phenomenon known as “completion errors.” Carey details studies describing both and discusses their varieties, as well as other possibilities, related to “muscle memory” and/or “autofilling” — when our fingers type faster than our brains.

Dennis Johnson is the founder of MobyLives, and the co-founder and co-publisher of Melville House.

  • http://stancarey.wordpress.com/ Stan Carey

    Hello Dennis! Thank you for your visit and for sharing my post on typos. I feel duty-bound to draw your attention to its title, which includes a deliberate typo of the type I discuss, and which you seem to have inadvertently corrected in your first paragraph: instead of typing that for than, you have typed than for that for than, which is quite the strange loop.

  • http://stancarey.wordpress.com/ Stan Carey

    Hello Dennis! Thank you for your visit and for sharing my post on typos. I feel duty-bound to draw your attention to its title, which includes a deliberate typo of the type I discuss, and which you seem to have inadvertently corrected in your first paragraph: instead of typing that for than, you have typed than for that for than, which is quite the strange loop.